Ok, if you’re familiar with Street Fighter 2 games, then you will probably find this hella funny. It’s two videos, you need to watch both of them and watch em in order. I’m not really a big fan of “fall” humor, where you laugh at people who fall…but just bear with me on this one!!
September 29, 2008
September 28, 2008
Are We Under Martial Law?
Did Pelosi declare martial law?
Listen very, very carefully. 1:22, “I understand we are under martial law, as declared by the speaker last night.”
At about 20:50 Rep.Burgess confirms the speaker declared martial law last night. And listen to the question at 42:22, if you so desireth.
I leave you in peace, and, hopefully, not in pieces.
September 26, 2008
BioMetrics: Welcome to the Novus Ordo SecLorum. And it Fits in Yer Pocket, TOO!
Ze bobbLebot has heardeth of the scary, scary tales of biometrics, but never for once believed it could touch those purple mountains majesty or sea to shining sea. But if biometrics WERE to happen, living in a post-9/11 world, we’d probably be the first place to git it.
Oh wait. We already did.
In fact, according to Security Info Watch:
In late June, the president signed HSPD-24, which directed federal agencies to integrate processes and interoperable systems to the fullest extent permitted by law - like the FBI’s IAFIS and the DHS’ US VISIT programs — and make available to other agencies all biometric and associated biographical and contextual information associated with individuals who pose a reasonable suspicion of threat to national security. HSPD-24 was a result of the 9-11 Commission’s report that was strongly critical of federal agencies’ lack of communication and data sharing during the national crisis.
Whaaaaat? And where was the bobbLebot??!
Oh yeah, living under a rock.

::shrugs:: it's comfy.
But HOLD UP. WHAT IS BIOMETRICS?!
Well YouTube’s glad you asked.
And it’s not just fingerprints – it’s a system of biological data, from the patterns in our irises to our blood samples, that will be used to create profiles for a larger, national database so that, eventually, every citizen’s movements can be tracked via ID cards or even implanted microchips. Sound unlikely?
YO! Workers are being implanted with chips! And we’re not talking Fritos! Mmmm… Fritos…
::drooLs::
But yeah, the defense is that the technology for implantable chips are so rudimentary that they can’t yet track movement and location.
::makes a face::
1st of all, how do we know this? 2nd of all, does this mean that this technology will always be out of reach? 3rd of all, couldn’t what is being purported to be for our own protection in fact be for our own enslavement? To jail us? To put us in a position where our own information can be misconstrued and used against us?
So what can this biometric system be used for? Well, W explained it best back in 6/6/06:
Sounds a little Big Brother and Conspiracy Theory.
::pause::
AND?
And it’s going beyond sea to shining sea. In fact, it’s starting to be implemented in the form of ID cards in Britain. RIGHT NOW. Think about how fast this will spread in 2 years… and by that time, I wonder if the biometrics utilized will hold more sophisticated technologies.

i always feel like... somebody's watching meeee...and i've got no privacy - whoa-oh!
Cory Doctorow, your average, everyday weird/COOL! news and gadgetry blogger explains his experience via boingboing:
Earlier this year, I married my British fiancee and switched my visa status from “Highly Skilled Migrant” to “Spouse.” This wasn’t optional: Jacqui Smith, the British Home Secretary, had unilaterally (and on 24 hours’ notice) changed the rules for Highly Skilled Migrants to require a university degree, sending hundreds of long-term, productive residents of the UK away (my immigration lawyers had a client who employed over 100 Britons, had fathered two British children, and was nonetheless forced to leave the country, leaving the 100 jobless). Smith took this decision over howls of protests from the House of Lords and Parliament, who repeatedly sued her to change the rule back, winning victory after victory, but Smith kept on appealing (at tax-payer expense) until the High Court finally ordered her to relent (too late for me, alas).
Now, it seems, I will become one of the first people in Britain to be forced to carry a mandatory biometric RFID card in a pilot programme being deployed first to foreign students and we spousal visa holders (government is looking to curtail spousal visas altogether, capping all visas at 20,000 per year, including spousal visas, denying Britons the right to bring their spouses into the country once the quota has been filled). The card will be eventually linked to all of the national databases — credit, health, driving, spending. These are the same databases that the government has been repeatedly losing and haemmorhaging by the tens of million (literally).
And so it begins.
Many of my British friends act as if I’m crazy when I say that we must defeat Labour in the next election. We’re all good lefties, and a vote for the LibDems is considered tantamount to handing the country over to the Tories. But what could the Tories do that would trump what Labour has made of the country? The Labour Party has made a police state with a melting economy, a place where rampant xenophobia makes foreigners less and less welcome — where we are made to hand over our biometrics and carry papers as we conduct our lawful business. The only mainstream party to speak out against this measure is the LibDems, and they will have my vote.
To my friends, I say this: your Labour Party has taken my biometrics and will force me to carry the papers my grandparents destroyed when they fled the Soviet Union. In living memory, my family has been chased from its home by governments whose policies and justification the Labour Party has aped. Your Labour Party has made me afraid in Britain, and has made me seriously reconsider my settlement here. I am the father of a British citizen and the husband of a British citizen. I pay my tax. I am a natural-born citizen of the Commonwealth. The Labour Party ought not to treat me — nor any other migrant — in a way that violates our fundamental liberties. The Labour Party is unmaking Britain, turning it into the surveillance society that Britain’s foremost prophet of doom, George Orwell, warned against. Labour admits that we migrants are only the first step, and that every indignity that they visit upon us will be visited upon you, too. If you want to live and thrive in a free country, you must defend us too: we must all hang together, or we will surely hang separately.
Would the bobbLebot be correct in assessing that this sh*t is bananas?
This is REAL, people! This is NOW, people! And what will it take for us to wake up to see what is going on right in front of us? We all have the power to say NO.
We’ve already heard of China’s All-Seeing Eye, the US government is already implementing biometrics while private companies are voluntarily implanting their workers with chips. Meanwhile, in Britain, the government is using biometric data to track immigrants and foreign nationals.
Is something wrong with the picture here?
September 22, 2008
How the financial bubble burst
This is a pretty tidy summary of the financial crisis which you’ve surely been hearing about. I’ll post a bit of it, it’s worth checking out the whole thing though. Al Jazeera:
The roots of the panic in financial markets around the world are deep and complex but they lie in the convergence of three factors.
Millions of people pursuing the “American dream” of home ownership, politicians and regulators who dismantled a system of financial safeguards and then ignored warnings of impending disaster and financial markets and institutions disregarding risk in their headlong pursuit of profit.
Let’s go back to the beginning – or at least to the year 2000 – when the ‘Dotcom’ boom went bust.
That drove down stocks and sparked a recession and then came the attacks of September 11, 2001 – a body blow to the US economy.
To hasten economic recovery, the US central bank, the Federal Reserve headed by Alan Greenspan, used the most powerful weapon in its arsenal – it cut interest rates repeatedly.
Lower rates made it easier for banks to lend and consumers to borrow and spend.
“It did stimulate the economy,” says Clyde Prestowitz, the head of the Economic Strategy Institute.
“And it stimulated housing, because effectively the cost of investment was negative, you could borrow money for virtually nothing.”
September 19, 2008
Poll: Obama tops McCain as football-watching buddy
Finally, a poll that asks the questions that matter! Yahoo:
WASHINGTON – People would rather watch a football game with Barack Obama than with John McCain — but by barely the length of a football.
Obama was the pick over McCain by a narrow 50 percent to 47 percent, according to an Associated Press-Yahoo News poll released Friday that generally mirrored each presidential candidate’s strengths and weaknesses with voters. Women, minorities, younger and unmarried people were likelier to prefer catching a game with Obama while men, whites, older and married people would rather watch with McCain.
“I think he’d be fun to sit back with and hear his experiences, all his stories,” said Kyle Ferguson, 28, a Republican from Santa Rosa, Calif., who picked McCain. But reflecting a sense some voters have of McCain based on the complaints of a few Senate colleagues, he added warily, “I bet he’d probably get pretty angry and lit up if his team was losing.”
Democrat James Smith, 29, of Asheville, N.C., picked Obama because he believes he and the Democratic senator from Illinois have more in common.
“With McCain, I have such an age difference,” said Smith of theArizona senator, who is 72. But with Obama, 47, he said, “If things went well with the conversation, the football game would be forgotten. There’d be a lot of back and forth.”
Such views are significant because in many elections, candidates considered more likable have an advantage.
I think I’d rather watch a game with Obama. Although I wouldn’t dismiss McCain though, he could probably tell me stories about partying with the players in the 1920’s, rollin around in their Model T’s.
Oh, Bama! Nothing Beats Racism With Your Morning Box-O-Waffle Mix.
Dammit. Dammit, dammit, dammit.
The bobbLebot is not happy-eth. Why? Because the bobbLebot computes that this election is more than a little ridunKulous. It’s a friggin circus!!! We’ve got posterchild of feminism Moosey Lucy Goosey in one corner with the jabbity jabby Tina Fey/Amy Poehler skit in one corner, then we’ve got OWG, Rhetorical brilliance (and yes, that is con a capital ‘R’) with racist-arse buffoonery in the other.
This is not an election, this is made-for-TV! But – alas… when has America last had a “free” election, anyway. Que oxymoronic. <– not cynical, but critical.
Anywho, this robot’s Achille’s heel tends to be, “RACISM?! WTF??!!!” — and today’s case would be no different. Oh, identity politics, what you have doneth to me!
BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH. Okay, the bobbLebot cannot help itself. But… on the other side of the coin, the bobbLebot is ethically opposed to voting. Besides, robots don’t have rights in this country anyway.
Move over, Aunt Jemima! There’s a new mix in town!

mmm... that's "sho good eatin'"
Meet Obama Waffles… with “change you can taste”. Oh, but wait — it gets better. Or so says Chip Berlet’s blog post:
The boxes of Obama Waffles for sale at the 2008 Values Voter Summit were certainly racist and offensive, and conference organizers did the right thing by shutting down the sales booth in their exhibit hall.
It was alternative journalists, including those working for Political Research Associates and People for the American Way, that first alerted the mainstream media to the offensive caricatures on the boxes with online posts from the conference.
This is what voting tastes like.

Patriotism at its finest.
Now, why would Rev Wright be MISSING?

Southern Subtext: because he's running from the law or because he got caught up in a lynching
Dudes. Racism can be offensive, racism can be completely moronic — and then there are times when racism is downright creepy.
Aaaaaaaand… the party doesn’t stop.
There is a side panel recipe for “Barry’s Bling Bling Waffle Ring” that features a “Recipe Rap” that begins with “Yo, B-rock here droppin’ waffle knowledge” with the rest of the ditty written in such an irritating White caricature of Black rap that even a White 1920s vaudeville blackface crooner would be embarrassed.

Open Border Fiesta Waffles!
Under the caricature of Obama as a Mexican, there is a recipe card for “Open Border Fiesta Waffles.” The recipe card depicts a perforated border between the U.S.A. and Mexico. The text under this says the “greatest danger of all is to allow walls to divide us”…The recipe card on the Obama Waffles box including ingredients such as goats milk and jalepeno peppers, and advises as a “Tip: While waiting for these zesty treats to invade your home, why not learn a foreign language.” The “Recommended Serving” is “4 or more illegal aliens.”
And the clincher’s just as dericious.

hm.
Though this blog post practically writes itself, there shall be commentary. As minimal as it will be.
The strategy of not directly addressing race, or to keeping it to a bare minimum has been a brilliant strategy. Why talk about race? The ground crew on both sides and in the middle of this issue will do the work for them. We’ve got Brown people talking about it, Yellow people talking about it — heck, we’ve even got White people talking about it… ALL THE TIME.
2 Reactions:
- Yay! We’ve got White people talking about race on major news outlets!
- ::cringe:: We’ve got White people talking about race on major news outlets.
In any case, if that isn’t Change, this roboT don’t know what is.
::bLip!::
September 17, 2008
Obama campaign files suit over “voter-foreclosure” plans
This is pretty disturbing…the GOP in Michigan is allegedly attempting to disenfranchise voters in Michigan who are having their homes foreclosed. The Obama campaign and the DNC have filed a lawsuit. The Michigan Messenger:
The Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee have filed a lawsuit in federal court in Michigan over the Michigan GOP’s plan to use foreclosure lists to challenge voters at the polls, as first reported by the Michigan Messenger.
Bob Bauer, general counsel for the Obama campaign, and Mark Brewer, chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party, announced the lawsuit in a conference call with reporters this afternoon…
Bauer called the GOP plan to use foreclosure lists “a new and especially repellent version of caging.” Caging is a technique of challenging voters where they take lists of addresses, mail to them with a “do not forward” marking and if for whatever reason those mailings are returned, they use this as a basis for claiming that the voter no longer lives at the address at which they are registered.
Bauer noted that using foreclosure lists to challenge a voter’s address is “false and illegal” for several reasons. First, because getting a foreclosure notice is not evidence that the person’s address has changed…Second, because under Michigan law a person can vote at their old precinct if they lost their home within 60 days of the election.
Palin’s Email Account Hacked (PHOTOS)
Sort of amusing. There’s screenshots of some of her email, if you click on the link you’ll see some of that. Huffington Post:
Wired magazine reports:
The group known as Anonymous, which earlier took on Scientology, has published screenshots of e-mail messages and images that it says came from a private e-mail account belonging to Governor Sarah Palin at gov.palin@yahoo.com. The data has been published by WikiLeaks.
Threat Level has confirmed the authenticity of at least one of the e-mails.
The information includes five screenshots from Palin’s account, including the text of an e-mail exchange with Alaskan Lieutenant Governor Sean Parnell about his campaign for Congress.
September 14, 2008
Palin, ahem, I mean Fey appears on SNL
Tina Fey did an impeccable job imitating Gov. Sarah Palin, air rifle and all. This was seriously too funny. Watch this now on SNL.
And while we’re talking about Palin, read this great political profile from the NYT:
Ms. Palin walks the national stage as a small-town foe of “good old boy” politics and a champion of ethics reform. The charismatic 44-year-old governor draws enthusiastic audiences and high approval ratings. And as the Republican vice-presidential nominee, she points to her management experience while deriding her Democratic rivals, Senators Barack Obama and Joseph R. Biden Jr., as speechmakers who never have run anything.
But an examination of her swift rise and record as mayor of Wasilla and then governor finds that her visceral style and penchant for attacking critics — she sometimes calls local opponents “haters” — contrasts with her carefully crafted public image.
Throughout her political career, she has pursued vendettas, fired officials who crossed her and sometimes blurred the line between government and personal grievance, according to a review of public records and interviews with 60 Republican and Democratic legislators and local officials.
September 11, 2008
Venezuela expels US ambassador
Not a great week for U.S. ambassadors in South America. Bolivia expelled the U.S. ambassador on Wednesday, and Venezuela followed suit on Thursday. NYT:
CARACAS, Venezuela — President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela said Thursday that he was expelling the American ambassador, Patrick Duddy, giving him 72 hours to leave the country. Mr. Chávez took this step after he said his government had discovered an American-supported plot by military officers to topple him.
He also recalled his ambassador to Washington, Bernardo Álvarez, and explained his decision by expressing solidarity with Bolivia’s embattled president, Evo Morales, who on Wednesday expelled the American ambassador there, Philip S. Goldberg, accusing him of supporting rebellious groups in eastern Bolivia..
“When there is a new government in the United States, we’ll send an ambassador,” Mr. Chávez said, using an expletive to refer to Americans…
…Mr. Chávez said Thursday that a plot to overthrow and assassinate him had been uncovered and that the Bush administration was behind it. Neither the State Department in Washington nor a spokeswoman at the American Embassy here would comment on the expulsion and the latest charges.